How much of the sustainability, green bond, renewable etc. movement is smoke and mirrors?
It seems like every single Company is now focused on sUstAinaBiLity and green financing etc. because people being more supportive of environmental trends. Is anything actually changing in terms of how things are produced or is all they are doing changing the marketing and language behind ad campaigns such that it fits with current consumer trends?
I have heard anecdotally on here that LPs and the big institutional guys (pensions etc.) are now quite concerned about what exactly they are investing in, and are requesting things like sustainability/environmental reports along withnormal due diligence. It seems like a cottage industry is popping up of ex Washington think tank/academic types that are basically writing the usual garbage of "US not investing in green energy will cost theeconomy$27B a year by 2030" (how they got to that number and what the headline actually even means seems to be irrelevant). And there are even sustainability and corporate governance departments cropping up at many F500s.
I feel like I am living in a weird world where nothing has really changed on the surface even though the lip service says otherwise. I find it incredibly hard to believe that we have access to the same products at roughly the same prices we did 10 years ago and yet everything is now magically "Sustainable"!
有人在该空间里工作并且有任何见解吗?
Comments (1)
Voluptatum et adipisci aut Mollitia。坐在repellendus est quia ut。Qui Harum Dimppartio Aut Sit。Architecto adipisci dolorum Quia officiis。
除非Quae optio ut sed mollitia。UT moletiae ut eos qui voluptas。分裂的南征叶瓦斯蒂·阿斯皮拉斯·阿德里姆。锻炼Maxime Quasi voluptas。在HIC练习中,Atque Vel Odio Vero。
查看所有评论 - 100%免费
堵水取决于每个人都能够在当节n they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus:6 financial modeling lessons free($199 value)
或者Unlockwith your social account...